Use of Contingent Valuation Methods for Eliciting The Willingness to Pay for Sanitation in Developing Countries

Thanh Hoang Nguyen, Minh Van Hoang, Huyen Thi Thu Doan, Chung Hong Le, Hung Viet Nguyen

Abstract


Information about willingness to pay (WTP) of households for improved sanitation is essential for policy makers to expand the improved sanitation coverage in population. We conducted this systematic review on contingent valuation (CV) method to eliciting the WTP of people for improved sanitation, using various kind of CV methods, such as: Open-ended question, Payment card, Dichotomous choice and Bidding Game. The online search was performed in multiple electronic databases including MEDLINE, Pubmed, Web of Sciences and EMBASE. Some search engines namely Google or Google Scholar and expert consultations were also used. Twelve stated preference studies using contingent valuation methods for improved sanitation and related services were found, especially in Asia and Africa. Iterative bidding game and dichotomous choice questions were found both highly sensitive to tests of household consumption and income.

Keywords


Systematic review; willingness to pay; contingent valuation; sanitation

Full Text:

Download PDF

References


Van Minh H, Nguyen-Viet H, Thanh NH, Yang JC. Assessing willingness to pay for improved sanitation in rural Vietnam. Environ Health Prev Med. 2013;18(4):275-284.

Gunatilake H, Yang J-c, Pattanayak S, Choe KA. Good Practices for Estimating Reliable Willingness-To-Pay Values in The water supply and sanitation sector. Manila: Asian Development Bank;2007.

Heinzen RR, Bridges JF. Comparison of four contingent valuation methods to estimate the economic value of a pneumococcal vaccine in Bangladesh. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2008;24(4):481-487.

Klose T. The contingent valuation method in health care. Health Policy. 1999;47(2):97-123.

Onwujekwe O, Uzochukwu B. Stated and actual altruistic willingness to pay for insecticide-treated nets in Nigeria: validity of open-ended and binary with follow-up questions. Health Econ. 2004;13(5):477-492.

Bateman IJ, Langford IH, Rasbash J. Willingness-To-Pay Question Format Effects in Contingent Valuation Studies. In: Bateman IJ, Willis KG, eds. Valuing Environmental Preferences: Theory and Practice of the Contingent Valuation Method in the US, EU, and Developing Countries. New York: Oxford; 2001:512 - 539.

Ryan M, Scott DA, Donaldson C. Valuing health care using willingness to pay: a comparison of the payment card and dichotomous choice methods. J Health Econ. 2004;23(2):237-258.

Food and Agriculture Organization. Applications of the contingent valuation method in developing countries: A survey. Economic and Social Development Department;2000.

Blamey RK, Bennett JW, Morrison MD. Yea-Saying in Contingent Valuation Surveys. Land Economics. 1999;75(1):126-141.

Boyle KJ, Johnson FR, McCollum DW, Desvousges WH, Dunford RW, Hudson SP. Valuing Public Goods: Discrete versus Continuous Contingent-Valuation Responses. Land Economics. 1996;72(3):381-396.

Cameron TA, Huppert DD. OLS versus ML estimation of non-market resource values with payment card interval data. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management. 1989;17(3):230-246.

Whittington D, Lauria DT, Wright AM, Choe K, Hughes JA, Swarna V. Household Demand for Improved Sanitation Services in Kumasi, Ghana: A Contingent Valuation Study Water Resources Research. 1993;29(6):1539–1560.

Altaf MA. Household demand for improved water and sanitation in a large secondary city: Findings from a study in Gujranwala, Pakistan. Habitat International. 1994;18(1):45-55.

Altaf MA, Hughes JA. Measuring the Demand for Improved Urban Sanitation Services: Results of a Contingent Valuation Study in Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso. Urban Studies. 1994;31(10):1763-1776.

Seraj KFB. Willingness to Pay for Improved Sanitation Services and its Implication on Demand Responsive Approach of BRAC Water, Sanitation and Hygiene Programme Dhaka: Research and Evaluation Division, BRAC;2008.

Rahji MA, Oloruntoba EO. Determinants of households' willingness-to-pay for private solid waste management services in Ibadan, Nigeria. Waste Manag Res. 2009;27(10):961-965.

Meeks JV. Willingness to Pay for Maintenance and Improvements to Existing Sanitation Infrastructure: Assessing Community-Led Total Sanitation in Mopti, Mali [Master of Science]. Florida: Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, College of Engineering, University of South Florida; 2012.

Fujita Y, Fujii A, Furukawa S, Ogawa T. Estimation of Willingness-to-Pay (WTP) for Water and Sanitation Services through Contingent Valuation Method (CVM): A Case Study in Iquitos City, The Republic of Peru. JBICI Review. 2005;11:59-87.

Afroz R, Masud MM. Using a contingent valuation approach for improved solid waste management facility: evidence from Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. Waste Manag. 2011;31(4):800-808.

Afroz R, Hanaki K, Hasegawa-Kurisu K. Willingness to pay for waste management improvement in Dhaka city, Bangladesh. J Environ Manage. 2009;90(1):492-503.

Gezahegne BB. Household demand for improved sanitation services: a contingent valuation study on Addis Ababa, Ethiopia [Master of Science]. Addis Ababa: Faculty of Business and Economics, Addis Ababa University; 2003.

Roy AT, Deb U. Households Willingness to Pay for Improved Waste Management In Silchar Municipal Area: A Case Study In Cachar District, Assam. Journal Of Humanities And Social Science. 2013;6(5):21-31.

Onwujekwe O, Nwagbo D. Investigating starting-point bias: a survey of willingness to pay for insecticide-treated nets. Soc Sci Med. 2002;55(12):2121-2130.

Frew EJ, Wolstenholme JL, Whynes DK. Comparing willingness-to-pay: bidding game format versus open-ended and payment scale formats. Health Policy. 2004;68(3):289-298.

Dong H, Kouyate B, Cairns J, Sauerborn R. A comparison of the reliability of the take-it-or-leave-it and the bidding game approaches to estimating willingness-to-pay in a rural population in West Africa. Soc Sci Med. 2003;56(10):2181-2189.

Chestnut LG, Ostro B, Vichit-Vadakan N, Smith KR, Tsai FC. Health effects of particulate matter air pollution in Bangkok. Air Quality and Noise Management, Pollution Control Department, Royal Thai Government;1998.

Dale W. Administering contingent valuation surveys in developing countries. World Development. 1998;26(1):21-30.